Thu, May. 15th, 2008, 11:35 am
Climate Change Denial...

Can someone explain this to me?

I just got a lecture about the "Global Warming Hoax" and how "Gore is a Fraud" from a neighbor.

Where is the hate and misinformation coming from?

People still don't see climate change going on in the world?

Thu, May. 15th, 2008 07:00 pm (UTC)
[info]sethanikeem

Actually, someone has managed to get some credible-reading articles and opinions out there that we are entering an ice age and not at all in global warming. There is definitely some hate and misinformation going on.

--M

Thu, May. 15th, 2008 07:01 pm (UTC)
[info]itsmrwilson

The press likes controversy, so they give air time to the one crackpot in a thousand who thinks otherwise, and it gives fuel to anyone who wants to live in denial.

Thu, May. 15th, 2008 07:34 pm (UTC)
(Anonymous): Its the Sun Retard

Its the sun you retards.

Thu, May. 15th, 2008 08:19 pm (UTC)
[info]itsmrwilson: Re: Its the Sun Retard

Matt, apparently one of Bush's scientific advisors reads your LJ.

Thu, May. 15th, 2008 08:23 pm (UTC)
[info]flamesrising: Re: Its the Sun Retard

Apparently so.

I've blocked Anonymous comments now.

Thu, May. 15th, 2008 10:47 pm (UTC)
[info]burgonet: Re: Its the Sun Retard

"The Anonymous Retards" does sound like a cracking good band name though.
Here in Australia we've living with the results of climate change, particularly with a literal transformation of our water/rain system.
A literal 'chickens coming home to roost' after a hundred and fifty odd years of land and tree clearing among other things.

In short, I think people buy into this "isn't not real! It's a conspiracy!" because they're either:
A) Prone to magical or circular thinking
or
B) wanting to believe as their peers tell them it is a hoax.

While it's true a lot of converts to climate change as an idea are mostly in that B) category themselves, there is more than enough independent scientific analysis out there to back up the idea that mankind is forever changing the planet's natural dynamic.

Likewise it's why the concept was changed in the public eye from 'global warming' to 'climate change'. Apart from being an easier sell in the ideas market, we're not entirely sure what the changes are going to be. Not precisely, not yet. I reckon we're due for a shorter period of increased heat, followed by a longer term early-coming Ice Age myself, based on what I've read.

But the definitive scientific answer is yet to be reached. The good thing about science is that it's an ongoing process, less prone to faith statements and willing to change its outlook based upon the data at hand and the conclusions that can be made therein.

Fri, May. 16th, 2008 07:38 am (UTC)
[info]atolnon

I think what it might be is fear. If global warming is a real issue, then it means that they're implicated. If they're looking for someone to make them feel better about things, then anything that says it's science, no matter how tenuously connected to real data, then they can just sign off on the whole matter.

Save a little stress in an increasingly hectic world. But it looks like they're wrong, doesn't it?

Sat, May. 17th, 2008 07:32 pm (UTC)
[info]metallian

People are credulous about all sorts of things and believe them with very little evidence...

...unless they think higher taxes might be required to deal with it. Then they get all Agent Scully.